What this means, is that in a given situation one person may calculate the most loving thing to do by using Situation ethics, yet another person may perform the same calculations, using exactly the same guidelines and principles, and arrive at a different result.
How very inconsistent you are! Elsewhere we have discussed these ideas in greater detail Jackson Here is another matter for reflection.
It is certain that the mortality or immortality of the soul must make an entire difference to morality. Therefore if a terminally ill patient in a hospital desired to be allowed to die to end his suffering, a Roman Catholic would deem this immoral.
One of his sons, disillusioned by the immorality of his father and the death of his mother, began a life of crime, and finally was imprisoned for murder.
Hire Writer He circulated this theory in the s, having used his beliefs and concerns to come up with, what he believed, was a fair way of deciding what the right action to take in a situation should be.
An absolute legal point of view would be that breaking the law is always wrong, and violators should be punished. Relativism — there are no fixed rules that must be obeyed, but all decisions must be relative to Christian love.
The foregoing declaration is wholly void of reason. A married man, with whom she works, decides to have an affair with her in order to comfort her. What a perverted viewpoint!
This concept affirms that there is an absolute, objective standard of right and wrong grounded in the holy nature of God himselfand this code of moral conduct is set forth in the Bible—reaching its zenith in the New Testament. Moreover, it is claimed that even Christ sanctioned the principle of situationism when he appealed to the circumstance of David and his men eating the showbread, normally reserved for priests only, in an emergency situation Matthew The disciples, being hungry, began to pluck grain and to eat.
Unfortunately, this is incredibly difficult; some claim it is impossible. For example, an absolute view would be that honesty is a moral principle and should be followed in all situations.
Positivism — this can be divided into two categories; natural positivism, where reason deduces faith from natural phenomena or human experience, and theological positivism, where reason works within faith as opposed to being the basis for faith.
Her motive was right, even though her method was wrong. If this dogma is true, the martyrs died in vain! The narrative regarding Rahab merely provides an example of where God honored a woman due to her obedient faith—in spite of her character flaw.
The Necessity of Ethical Absolutes. We simply cannot accurately predict the consequences of an action, as there are always a large number of factors, some of which we may even be unaware of, and the required calculations are by and large far too complicated to be done at all, let alone on the spur of the moment in a pressing situation.
Actually, neither of these cases provides the coveted justification for the practice of situation ethics. Actually, when boiled down, situationism is not substantially different from nihilism, for, as Joseph Fletcher confesses: Because situation ethics does emphasize contextual appropriateness, it leads to the notion that an action indeed may be considered acceptable if the end is defined as fitting or appropriate.
Value is only added to something when it is useful to love working for the sake of persons.Situation ethics is a popular belief in a world bent on departure from God.
But it does not have the sanction of the Holy Scriptures, and, if persistently pursued, will ultimately result in societal chaos. Situation ethics is an alternative ethical theory, particularly influential in Protestant Christianity, similar to utilitarianism, in that it is a way a deciding upon the correct action that is to be taken in a given situation, but where happiness has.
Situation ethics is based on four working principles pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism. The first principle is pragmatism which is the practical action to bring about the most loving end.
Free situation ethics papers, essays, and research papers. ‘Situation Ethics is not a practical method of moral decision making?’ How far do you agree? The strongest argument for situation ethics not being a practical method of moral decision making is that it relies on predicting the consequences of an action.
The term situation ethics, coined by Joseph Fletcher inis sometimes referred to as “situational ethics” or as “situationism.” Fletcher and others argued that moral and legal absolutes are inflexible and do not allow for rational, thinking humans to make choices and decisions based on the specifics and characteristics of social events.Download