All eleven jurors, except one Juror 8 voted guilty. Henry Fonda Juror 8 illustrates important principles of leadership and influence in which the right person can lead group members to achieve a common goal, yet go through positive individual changes. When you present your point of view, regardless of the initial support, you will be heard, and you may just be the voice another person needs to hear to speak out against the majority.
This was the least displayed trait of all. We felt that Juror 6 displayed a Style Approach to leadership, particularly an Authority Compliance style. He just wants to get out of there as soon as he can.
Henry Fonda emerged as a very successful leader because he showed value in others, empathy, seriousness and integrity. Juror 2 began to realize that he could not remember either, and he was not even under any emotional stress.
This paper examines the application of leadership concepts in the characters of each juror. Others, however, are more open-minded and are curious to hear what he has to say. As a leader, Juror 8 stands out for various reasons. He trusts that the team members will make the right vote.
He emerged at the very beginning as a natural leader, because he stepped up to being the foreman, or the one who ran the deliberation. He does not hesitate to step up as the foreman, which is essentially the leader of the group.
The first, intelligence, does not insinuate that one must be book smart. Juror 8 began to ask juror 2 when he went to the movie last, and what movie he had seen, and who had played in it. For example, the old man sitting next to Fonda seemed to be the most intrigued by Fonda, simply because he had the courage to be different.
He shows little respect for anyone but himself. Your IQ does not necessarily reflect an effective leader. He acts as a mediator for all of the arguments that went on in the jury room. It was not until after he was sure the game was over, that he began to show any interest in the case.
He controls and leads every discussion, speaking order, voting, and demonstration. Well-educated, well-dressed stockbroker, presumably wealthy; studious, possesses an incredible recall and grasp of the facts of the case; cool-headed and rational, yet stuffy and prim; treats the case like a puzzle to be solved rather than as a case that may send the defendant to death.
Juror seemed to think that it was nearly impossible for the boy to forget the movie he was supposedly at during the time his father was murdered. Juror 6 definitely exhibits this behavior. When facts began to present in the jury room, many had forgotten very important ones.
This then creates new options and processes for the group to explore. Northouse in his book, Leadership: Leaders are defined by two separate characteristics; those who are appointed as the leader and those with no special title that emerge as influential.- Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose The play "Twelve Angry Men", By Reginald Rose, is a play about 12 jurors that in an uncomfortable room have to discuss a life and death case about a boy that is accused or killing his father.
the jurors do not really know eachother to talk to. The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father.
The deliberation starts with an vote for guilty. Leadership: In the movie 12 Angry Men there were two primary examples of leadership.
The first was in the beginning of the movie, when the foreman gets. Film Techniques in Twelve Angry Men Summary: Reviews the film Twelve Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet. Discusses the director's use of cinematic techniques, including lighting, music,and set design, to reinforce the themes of the story.
12 Angry Men Essay - Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves.
Twelve Angry Men Plot Summary Essay example. Twelve Angry Men Plot Summary A teenaged Hispanic boy has just been tried for the murder of his father, and the case is now in the hands of the jury.
A guilty verdict will send the boy to the electric chair. The case looks, on the surface, cut and dried.Download