It prevents victory that is solely based on urban regions. I said above about the post that needs to be passed. It is so widely recognised that the Puerto Ricans sometimes call the Independentistas who vote for the Populares "melons", because the fruit is green on the outside but red on the inside in reference to the party colors.
First of all, it is no guarantee that you will keep the candidate you dislike out of power. The difficulty is sometimes summed up, in an extreme form, as "All votes for anyone other than the second place are votes for the winner", because by voting for other candidates, they have denied those votes to the second place candidate who could have won had they received them.
While a popular vote is a simple majority, this political process involves redistributing votes every decade due to the election of delegates and population changes.
Consequently, candidates will less closely reflect the viewpoints of those who vote for them. It is a procedure that is comprised of a selection of electors who would meet to conduct the selection of the president and the vice Advantage and disadvantages of fptp voting.
If they only wish to vote for a single candidate, they may do. The Electoral College system provides each state the freedom to design individual laws with respect to voting. A newly appointed candidate, who is in fact supported by the majority of voters, may be considered due to the lack of a track record to not be likely to become one of the top two candidates; thus, they will receive a reduced number of votes, which will then give them a reputation as a low poller in future elections, compounding the problem.
This really is not an objective advantage or disadvantage of either AV or FPTP as both can be seen positively or negatively in this regard entirely based on your own subjective view of how governance should work.
This leads to doubts about democratic legitimacy. Supporters of the Electoral College system argue that when the president is elected directly, he will be able to declare a nationally known mandate that will undermine the other government branches, which will more likely lead to tyranny.
FPTP encourages tactical voting, as voters often vote not for the candidate they most prefer, but against the candidate they most dislike. Also, some states are known for voting consistently the Republican or the Democrat, so candidates might pay less attention to the states with more attention and clear favorites to big states.
Few G votes are wasted, and G will win a large number of seats by small margins. In this type of electoral process, sometimes the candidate who has got the majority of the popular vote does not win.
It also involves an electoral vote counting by Congress. The only information registered is that you have voted for a socialist party, or vice versa.
This phenomenon is responsible for some Popular victories, even though the Estadistas have the most voters on the island.
Bush still got the presidency as he earned more electoral votes. List of Cons of Electoral College 1. This type of vote wastage may be one of the reasons for low turnout, people do not see the point in voting if their vote is not going to count. Issues specific to particular countries[ edit ] Solomon Islands[ edit ] In AugustSir Peter Kenilorea commented on what he perceived as the flaws of a first-past-the-post electoral system in the Solomon Islands: A practical way to view this is to think of the AV vote as a series of FPTP votes, wherein as a voter you are giving alternative voting intentions depending on whether your most preferred candidate or candidates are running.
For FPTP the post can be any derivative of the number of candidates standing. However the alternative vote system was rejected by British voters in a referendum held on 5 May FPTP is ultimately a good or bad system depending on the distribution of political support around the country, and the number of candidates standing.
List of countries[ edit ]. In Electoral College, some smaller states have a larger percentage of votes than that when we consider the total American population, which is due to the fact that the minimum number of Electoral College votes for a state is three.
The establishment of the Electoral College system truly has both pros and cons, which you should be aware of so you will know where you stand. List of Pros of Electoral College 1.
First-past-the-post tends to reduce the number of political parties to a greater extent than most other methods do, making it more likely that a single party will hold a majority of legislative seats. Alternative electoral systems attempt to ensure that almost all votes are effective in influencing the result and the number of wasted votes is consequently minimised.
Voters do not need to put a number against all candidates for example, if they do not wish to give a vote to a candidate they disagree with completelybut they do need to at least put the number 1 against their most preferred candidate.
By AV alternative vote we mean the transferable vote between a single member in a constituency. Here are the Electoral College pros and cons: Voters put a cross in a box next to their favoured candidate, and the candidate who gathers the most votes in the constituency or other electoral area wins the election.
It maintains division of powers. Fewer political parties[ edit ] This section does not cite any sources. Manipulation charges[ edit ] The presence of spoilers often gives rise to suspicions that manipulation of the slate has taken place.
It protects the interests of the minority. It helps with maintaining the federal character of the country. This is viewed as a very negative way of participating in democracy, as you are not giving your support to the candidate you like, you are giving support against the candidate you dislike.The main disadvantage of current voting systems is that they’re not accurate enough.
This causes all sorts of problems from two-party systems and divisive politics, to minority rule and radicalized politicians. Plurality voting is literally the wo. The disadvantages and shortcomings of FPTP voting systems Representatives can get elected with small amounts of public support, as the size of the winning margin is irrelevant: what matters is only that they get more votes than other candidates.
Many of the advantages and disadvantages of FPTP are common to the other plurality-majority electoral systems as well and need not be repeated seriatim when each of these systems is examined.
Two considerations should be borne in mind in any review of electoral systems, the first relating to parties and the second to voters. The inbuilt disadvantages faced by third and fragmented minority parties under FPTP in many cases cause the party system to gravitate towards a.
First Past The Post - Advantages and Disadvantages. Advantages. for example those living in a 'safe seat' voting against the traditional party or a vote for a smaller party that is extremely unlikely to win a seat (eg. the Green party). although I do not agree with how unfair the FPTP system is based on it's disadvantages discussed.
Advantages and disadvantages of FPTP system Advantages of FPTP First Past The Post, like other plurality/majority electoral systems, is defended primarily on the grounds of simplicity and its tendency to produce winners who are representatives beholden to defined geographic areas and governability.Download